Brevard Public Schools
Updated: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 Search This Site


District Directory
Customer Service BPS-TV Pre-Paid Lunch
School Menu
BPS Emergencies
- BPS Emergency site

- Are you ready for a
  hurricane? 7 Year Facility Plan Update
Vendor Information
- District Bid Activity

- Purchasing Services


SSNP


 

BPS SCORECARD
School Results Profile

Printer
 Friendly Page


Main

Williams, Ralph M. Jr., Elementary School
1700 Clubhouse Drive
Rockledge, FL 32955

Phone: (321) 617-7700
Fax: (321) 617-7703

Cynthia S. Ford, Principal

School Website: Click Here.
School Improvement Plan Click Here.

Table of Contents:

SCHOOL DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

Total Enrollment
807
 Stability Rate
93.67

 

Number

Percent
Free/Reduced Lunch

203

25.70
Minority Enrollment
312
38.66
Exceptional Ed (not gifted)
134
16.6
Gifted Education
16
1.98
English Language Learners
17
2.1

SCHOOL GRADE INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-1 School Grade History

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

 A

A

 A

A
Figure 7.1-1f School Grade: % Making Math Gains

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

 79

80

77

74
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1a School Grade: % Meeting
 High Standards in Reading

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

 90

92

91

78
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1g School Grade: % of Lowest 25%
Making Learning Gains in Reading

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

 74

72

84

62
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1b School Grade: % Meeting
 High Standards in Math

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

 91

94

93

84
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.1-1h School Grade: % of Lowest 25%
Making Learning Gains in Math

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

 67

73

73

65
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1c School Grade: % Meeting
 High Standards in Writing

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

 91

77

91

 90
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1i School Grade: Total Points Earned

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

 641

655

663

583
Indicator should increase
* grading scale increased by 200 points in 2007
Figure 7.1-1d School Grade: % Meeting
 High Standards in Science

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

77

87

78

64
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1j School Grade: Rank in
District/State based on Total Points Earned

         2007
District/State

2008
District/State

2009
District/State

 n/a

 n/a

12

70

12

 126
Figure 7.1-1e School Grade: % Making Reading Gains

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

72

80

76

66
Indicator should increase		  
 

Back to Table of Contents

AYP (NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress) INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-8 AYP: % of Total Possible Cells Meeting AYP Standard (% of Criteria Met)

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

 100

100

100

79
 
Figure 7.1-8a AYP: % Scoring At or Above Grade Level in Reading

Subgroup

2007

2008

2009

2009 District/State

Total

 85

88

90

73

62

White

 90

92

93

77

72

Black

 70

70

n/a

51

44

Hispanic

 n/a

 n/a

 n/a

64

57

Econ Disadv

 70

 75

76 

63

52

Limited Eng

 n/a

 n/a

 n/a

42

42

Students w/ Disabilities

 n/a

 n/a

 n/a

46

36
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-8b AYP: % Scoring At or Above Grade Level in Math

Subgroup

2007

2008

2009

2009 District/State

Total

 86

 89

 92

78

67

White

 92

 94

 94

83

77

Black

 64

 72

 n/a

54

49

Hispanic

 n/a

 n/a

 n/a

70

64

Econ Disadv

 65

 75

 84

64

57

Limited Eng

 n/a

 n/a

 n/a

51

51

Students w/ Disabilities

 n/a

 n/a

 n/a

48

39
Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

FCAT Indicators
Figure 7.1-9       FCAT Reading

Figure 7.1-9a FCAT Reading Mean Scale Score

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 321 333 329

325

313

Grade 4

 339 349 350

337

324
Grade 5 3334 335 328 324 311
Grade 6 340 346 352 334 313

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-9d FCAT Reading Percent at Levels 4 & 5

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 44 49 52

47

39

Grade 4

 50 64 64

49

39
Grade 5 53 51 45 46 37
Grade 6 44 49 59 46 32
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-9b FCAT Reading Percent at Level 1

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 9 8 13

17

12

Grade 4

 7 2 3

7

13
Grade 5 5 5 5 9 14
Grade 6 3 4 1 8 16
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.1-9e FCAT Reading Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

 

2007
District/State

2008
District/State

2009
District/State

Grade 3

 30 559

 19

351

27

445

Grade 4

 18 215

 14

98

12

129
Grade 5 17 192 12 123 19 347
Grade 6 13 55 14 47 10 23
Figure 7.1-9c FCAT Reading Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

 

2007

2008

2009

      2009
District/State

Grade 3

 80 82 75

79

71

Grade 4

 84 93 91

84

74
Grade 5 89 87 90 80 71
Grade 6 91 87 75 82 66
Indicator should increase		  

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-11       FCAT Mathematics

Figure 7.1-11a FCAT Mathematics Mean Scale Score

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 357

 358

367

346

337

Grade 4

 341

 346

358

340

330
Grade 5 359 365 359 344 335
Grade 6 357 369 363 341 316

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-11d FCAT Math Percent at Levels 4 & 5

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 58

 49

64

53

46

Grade 4

 49

 64

60

46

39
Grade 5  63  51  63 44 36
Grade 6  54  49 65 43 26
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-11b FCAT Mathematics Percent at
 Level 1

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 1

 3

 2

8

10

Grade 4

 6

 6

 3

7

10
Grade 5  8  2  3 10 14
Grade 6 6  6 2 12 24
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.1-11e FCAT Mathematics Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

 

2007
District/State

2008
District/State

2009
District/State

Grade 3

 19

240

 16

288

13

234

Grade 4

 20

280

 23

275

 12

157
Grade 5  14 113  10 86  12 175
Grade 6  11 27  6 8  12 27
 
Figure 7.1-11c FCAT Mathematics
Percent Meeting High Standards
(Level 3, 4 and 5)

 

2007

2008

2009

      2009
District/State

Grade 3

 97

 90

 93

82

78

Grade 4

 85

 89

93

80

75
Grade 5  80  86  88 70 62
Grade 6  82  90  89 73 55
Indicator should increase		  

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-12       FCAT Science

Figure 7.1-12a FCAT Science Mean Scale Score

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 5

 349

356

340

334

314

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-12d FCAT Science Percent at Levels 4 & 5

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 5

 30

32

21

20

12
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-12b FCAT Science Percent at
 Level 1

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 5

 8

6

7

11

21
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.1-12e FCAT Science Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

 

2007
District/State

2008
District/State

2009
District/State
Grade 5 15 72 10 40 24 208
Figure 7.1-12c FCAT Science Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

 

2007

2008

2009

      2009
District/State
Grade 5 70 80 71 62 46
Indicator should increase		  

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-14       FCAT Writing

Figure 7.1-14a FCAT Writing Mean Essay Score

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 4

 4.0

 3.8

 4.2

 4.1

4.0

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-14b FCAT Writing Percent
Meeting High Standards
(Essay 3.5 and above)

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 4

 87

 76

 90

86

85

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

ACHIEVEMENT GAP INDICATORS

     
Figure 7.1-16-19 FCAT Learning Gap for Key
Demographics Subgroups (% Improvement
= difference between earliest and most
recent school years)

*baseline 2002 or first year reported

Figure 7.1-16a READING Percent Scoring Level
1 for School

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 21%   6% 5% 6% -15%
White 12%   3% 2% 3% -9%
Black 48%   15% 16% 14% -34%
Hispanic 14%   13% 0% 0% -14%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 52%   12% 12% 14% -38%
ESE 59%   31% 25% 21% -38%
Indicator should decrease		  



 
Figure 7.1-18a SCIENCE Percent Scoring Level 1

Subgroup 2006/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 14%   8% 6% 7% -7%
White 6%   3% 4% 4% -2%
Black 47%   30% 25% 14% -33%
Hispanic 27%   n/a 0% n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 41%   26% 20% 15% -26%
ESE 43%   55% 33% 27% -16%
Indicator should decrease
     
Figure 7.1-16b READING Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 68%   86% 87% 88% 20%
White 77%   90% 92% 92% 15%
Black 34%   69% 67% 71% 37%
Hispanic 73%   81% 36% 51% -22%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 30%   71% 71% 71% 41%
ESE 33%   57% 53% 57% 24%
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-18b SCIENCE Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup 2006/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 57%   70% 80% 71% 14%
White 67%   81% 86% 79% 12%
Black 7%   30% 38% 50% 43%
Hispanic 45%   n/a 92% n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 22%   39% 50% 40% 18%
ESE 14%   18% 33% 27% 13%
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-16c READING Percent Scoring Levels 4 or 5 for School

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 36%   48% 53% 55% 19%
White 43%   54% 60% 60% 17%
Black 9%   21% 26% 34% 25%
Hispanic 38%   31% 13% 32% -6%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 11%   19% 28% 33% 22%
ESE 14%   17% 14% 21% 7%
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-18c SCIENCE Percent Scoring Levels 4 or 5

Subgroup 2006/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 18%   30% 32% 21% 3%
White 23%   32% 37% 24% 1%
Black 0%   10% 31% 0% 0%
Hispanic 18%   n/a 8% n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 7%   4% 15% 10% 3%
ESE 14%   0% 7% 0% -14%
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-17a MATH Percent Scoring Level 1 for School

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 18%   5% 4% 2% -16%
White 10%   3% 1% 1% -9%
Black 45%   15% 16% 7% -38%
Hispanic 21%   13% 0% 2% -19%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 49%   17% 15% 6% -43%
ESE 57%   32% 19% 7% -50%
Indicator should decrease		  
Figure 7.1-19a WRITING Mean Essay Combined Score

Subgroup 2003/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 3.5   4.0 3.8 4.2 0.7
White 3.6   4.1 3.9 4.2 0.6
Black 3.0   3.9 3.4 3.9 0.9
Hispanic n/a   3.6 n/a 4.2 0.6
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 3.0   3.9 3.5 4.1 1.1
ESE 2.7   3.7 3.7 4.1 1.4
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-17b MATH Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 64%   86% 89% 91% 27%
White 74%   91% 94% 93%  19%
Black 30%   67% 68% 83%  53%
Hispanic 72%   69% 36% 51% - 21%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 33%   66% 71% 80%  47%
ESE 26%   61% 53% 63%  37%
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-19b WRITING % Scoring 3.0 or greater on Essay

Subgroup 2003/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 88%   95% 97% 96% 8%
White 92%   96% 100% 96%  4%
Black 66%   94% 81% 95%  29%
Hispanic n/a   86% n/a 100% 14%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 72%   92% 86% 99%  27%
ESE 58%   92% 100% 99%  41%
Indicator should increase
   
Figure 7.1-17c MATH Percent Scoring Levels 4
or 5 for School

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 34%   56% 58% 63% 29%
White 43%   64% 66% 70% 27%
Black 9%   29% 20% 31%  22%
Hispanic 57%   31% 26% 27% -30%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 10%   35% 31% 43% 33%
ESE 11%   28% 28% 30% 19%
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-19c WRITING % Scoring 3.5 or greater on Essay

Subgroup 2003/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 61%   87% 76% 90% 29%
White 65%   88% 83% 90%  25%
Black 44%   83% 52% 81%  37%
Hispanic n/a   79% n/a 90% 11%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 44%   79% 62% 92%  48%
ESE 16%   69% 64% 73%  57%
Indicator should increase


Back to Table of Contents

ATTENDANCE INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-28 Total School Student Attendance Rates (%)

2007

2008

2009

2009 District
95.88
96.25
96.8
96.52
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-28a Student Absences by Semester (# and %)

 

1st  Semester

2nd Semester

 

#

%

#

%

0 abs.
145
17.51
246
29.67

1-9 abs.
639
77.17
569
68.63

10-19 abs.
42
5.07
13
1.56

20-29 abs.
1
0.12
1
0.12

30+ abs.
1
0.12
0
0
 

Back to Table of Contents

SPECIAL PROGRAM INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-53 Music Programs
(# Participants/% of School)

2005

2006

2007
#       %

2007 District Avg.
#               %

 n/a

n/a

n/a

 n/a n/a n/a
Indicator should increase		  

Back to Table of Contents

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ADDITIONAL INDICATORS

Figure 7.3-1b Internal Accounts Audit (# of Deficiencies)

2005

2006

2007

2007 District Avg.

 3

0

  n/a

  n/a
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.5-8a 5-Star Cafeteria Rating (Score)

2006

2007

2008

2008 District Avg.

 94%

99%

95%

99%
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.4-13 Minority Staffing - Teacher (%)

2008

2009

2010

2010 District
12.5
9.43
7.41
11.42
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.5-14 Student/Modern Computer (Ratio)

2005

2006

2007

2007 District

 22:1

18:1

25:1

9:1
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.4-15 National Board Certified Teachers
(# and % of Teaching staff)

2008

2009

2010

2010 District
# % # % # % #