Brevard Public Schools
Updated: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 Search This Site


District Directory
Customer Service BPS-TV Pre-Paid Lunch
School Menu - BPS Emergency site

-
Are you ready for a
 
hurricane?
7 Year Facility Plan Update - District Bid Activity

-
Purchasing Services



SSNP


 

BPS SCORECARD
School Results Profile

Printer
 Friendly Page


Main

Surfside Elementary School
475 Cassia Blvd.

Satellite Beach, FL 32937-3198

Phone: (321) 773-2818
Fax
: (321) 777-1841

Susan B. Murray, Principal 

School Website: Click Here.
School Improvement Plan: Click Here.

School Grade Indicators

Figure 7.1-1 School Grade History

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

A A

A

A

Figure 7.1-1e School Grade: % Making Reading Gains

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

87 70

78

66

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1a School Grade: % Meeting
 High Standards in Reading

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

94 93 97 78
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1f School Grade: % Making Math Gains

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

82 76 68

74

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1b School Grade: % Meeting
 High Standards in Math

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

91 91 93 84
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1g School Grade: % of Lowest 25%
Making Learning Gains in Reading

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

88 73

77

62

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1c School Grade: % Meeting
 High Standards in Writing

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

98 77

98

90

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1h School Grade: % of Lowest 25%
Making Learning Gains in Math

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

76 79 59 65
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1d School Grade: % Meeting
 High Standards in Science

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

93 87

88

64

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1i School Grade: Total Points Earned

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

709 646

658

583

Indicator should increase
 

2007
District/State

2008
District/State

2009
District/State

 n/a

 n/a

 15

 95

13 146
 

Back to Table of Contents

AYP (NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress) INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-8 AYP: % of Total Possible Cells Meeting AYP Standard (% of Criteria Met)

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

 100

100

 100

79

 
Figure 7.1-8a AYP: % Scoring At or Above Grade Level in Reading

Subgroup

2007

2008

2009

2009 District/State

Total

93 91 90 73 62

White

94 92 92 77 72

Black

n/a n/a n/a 51 44

Hispanic

n/a n/a n/a 64 57

Econ Disadv

n/a n/a n/a 63 52

Limited Eng

n/a n/a n/a 42 42

Students w/ Disabilities

n/a n/a n/a 46 36
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-8b AYP: % Scoring At or Above Grade Level in Math

Subgroup

2007

2008

2009

2009 District/State

Total

90 91 87 78 67

White

91 93 88 83 77

Black

n/a n/a n/a 54 49

Hispanic

n/a n/a n/a 70 64

Econ Disadv

n/a n/a n/a 64 57

Limited Eng

n/a n/a n/a 51 51

Students w/ Disabilities

n/a n/a n/a 48 39
Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

FCAT Indicators
Figure 7.1-9       FCAT Reading

Figure 7.1-9a FCAT Reading Mean Scale Score

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

356 334 355 325 313

Grade 4

358 358 351 337 324
Grade 5 350 342 337 324 311
Grade 6 343 357 356 334 313

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-9d FCAT Reading Percent at Levels 4 & 5

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

66 54 79 47 39

Grade 4

63 72 66 49 39
Grade 5 70 55 60 46 37
Grade 6 54 58 69 46 32
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-9b FCAT Reading Percent at Level 1

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

2 8 4 12 17

Grade 4

0 2 3 7 13
Grade 5 2 4 8 9 14
Grade 6 1 0 3 8 16
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.1-9e FCAT Reading Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

 

2007
District/State

2008
District/State

2009
District/State

Grade 3

 7

37

 18

327

7 48

Grade 4

 8

28

 6

26

10 105
Grade 5 9 33 9 58 12 184
Grade 6 11 39 9 16 7 14
Figure 7.1-9c FCAT Reading Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

 

2007

2008

2009

      2009
District/State

Grade 3

90 86 91 79 71

Grade 4

100 91 88 84 74
Grade 5 93 91 90 80 71
Grade 6 90 95 95 82 66
Indicator should increase
 

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-11       FCAT Mathematics

Figure 7.1-11a FCAT Mathematics Mean Scale Score

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 364

 345

379 346 337

Grade 4

 353

 364

348 340 330
Grade 5 370 355 361 344 335
Grade 6 357 361 342 341 316

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-11d FCAT Math Percent at Levels 4 & 5

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 63

 54

77

53 46

Grade 4

 51

 72

44

46 39
Grade 5 67 55 55 44 36
Grade 6 50 58 38 43 26
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-11b FCAT Mathematics Percent at
 Level 1

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 0

 2

2 8 10

Grade 4

 0

 2

3 7 10
Grade 5 0 6 5 10 14
Grade 6 4 0 5 12 24
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.1-11e FCAT Mathematics Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

 

2007
District/State

2008
District/State

2009
District/State

Grade 3

 11

 148

 31

561

8 84

Grade 4

 9

108

 9

73

17 313
Grade 5 6 34 14 202 11 142
Grade 6 11 27 9 17 26 123
 
Figure 7.1-11c FCAT Mathematics
Percent Meeting High Standards
(Level 3, 4 and 5)

 

2007

2008

2009

      2009
District/State

Grade 3

 96

 88

96 82 78

Grade 4

 94

 95

81 80 75
Grade 5 88 89 85 70 62
Grade 6 85 91 80 73 55
Indicator should increase
 

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-12       FCAT Science

Figure 7.1-12a FCAT Science Mean Scale Score

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 5

 373

354

362

334 314

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-12d FCAT Science Percent at Levels 4 & 5

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 5

 41

29

40

20

12

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-12b FCAT Science Percent at
 Level 1

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 5

 2

6

3

11

21

Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.1-12e FCAT Science Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

 

2007
District/State

2008
District/State

2009
District/State

Grade 5 5 7 11 52 7 27
Figure 7.1-12c FCAT Science Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

 

2007

2008

2009

      2009
District/State

Grade 5 91 83 79 62 46
Indicator should increase
 

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-14       FCAT Writing

Figure 7.1-14a FCAT Writing Mean Essay Score

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 4

 4.3

 3.8

 4.2

4.1 4.0

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-14b FCAT Writing Percent
Meeting High Standards
(Essay 3.5 and above)

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 4

 98

77

 97

86 85

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

 

ACHIEVEMENT GAP INDICATORS

     
Figure 7.1-16-19 FCAT Learning Gap for Key
Demographics Subgroups (% Improvement
= difference between earliest and most
recent school years)

*baseline 2002 or first year reported

Figure 7.1-16a READING Percent Scoring Level
1 for School

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline
  2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 7%   1% 4% 5% -2%
White 6%   1% 3% 4% -2%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 13%   8% 3% 3% -10%
ESE 26%   10% 10% 20% -6%
Indicator should decrease
 



 
Figure 7.1-18a SCIENCE Percent Scoring Level 1

Subgroup 2006/
Baseline
  2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 3%   2% 6% 3% 0%
White 1%   0% 4% 2% 1%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 10%   n/a 10% n/a n/a
ESE 9%   n/a n/a 20% 11%
Indicator should decrease
     
Figure 7.1-16b READING Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline
  2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 79%   93% 91% 91% 12%
White 80%   94% 92% 92% 12%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 70%   62% 27% 27% -43%
ESE 35%   90% 51% 31% -4%
Indicator should increase
 
Figure 7.1-18b SCIENCE Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup 2006/
Baseline
  2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 67%   91% 83% 79% 12%
White 68%   94% 85% 82% 14%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 50%   n/a 60% n/a n/a
ESE 73%   n/a n/a 50% -23%
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-16c READING Percent Scoring Levels 4 or 5 for School

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline
  2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 47%   63% 60% 68% 21%
White 48%   64% 61% 71% 23%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 26%   31% 13% 21% -5%
ESE 13%   30% 26% 20% 7%
Indicator should increase
 
Figure 7.1-18c SCIENCE Percent Scoring Levels 4 or 5

Subgroup 2006/
Baseline
  2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 18%   41% 29% 40% 22%
White 19%   40% 31% 42% 23%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 0%   n/a 10% n/a n/a
ESE 0%   n/a n/a 10% 10%
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-17a MATH Percent Scoring Level 1 for School

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline
  2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 5%   1% 2% 4% -1%
White 5%   1% 2% 4% -1%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 5%   8% 3% 3% -2%
ESE 13%   0% 0% 12% -1%
Indicator should decrease
 
Figure 7.1-19a WRITING Mean Essay Combined Score

Subgroup 2003/
Baseline
  2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 3.9   4.3 3.8 4.2 0.3
White 3.9   4.3 3.9 4.2 0.3
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ESE 3.8   n/a 3.8 3.6 -0.2
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-17b MATH Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline
  2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 79%   90% 91% 85% 6%
White 80%   91% 92% 86% 6%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 67%   62% 27% 27% -40%
ESE 48%   100% 61% 26% -22%
Indicator should increase
 
Figure 7.1-19b WRITING % Scoring 3.0 or greater on Essay

Subgroup 2003/
Baseline
  2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 100%   100% 93% 99% -1%
White 100%   100% 94% 99% -1%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ESE 90%   n/a 90% 90% 0%
Indicator should increase
   
Figure 7.1-17c MATH Percent Scoring Levels 4
or 5 for School

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline
  2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 38%   59% 53% 53% 15%
White 39%   60% 56% 55% 16%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 21%   31% 13% 9% -12%
ESE 13%   70% 19% 14% 1%
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-19c WRITING % Scoring 3.5 or greater on Essay

Subgroup 2003/
Baseline
  2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 87%   98% 77% 97% 10%
White 87%   98% 79% 96% 9%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ESE 80%   n/a 80% 82% 2%
Indicator should increase


Back to Table of Contents

ATTENDANCE INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-28 Total School Student Attendance Rates (%)

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

96.48
96.31
96.95
96.49
Indicator should increase
 
Figure 7.1-28a Student Absences by Semester (# and %)

 

1st  Semester

2nd Semester

 

#

%

#

%

0 abs.

77
17.11
127
28.79

1-9 abs.

355
78.88
311
70.52

10-19 abs.

18
4
3
0.68

20-29 abs.

0
0
0
0

30+ abs.

0
0
0
0
 

Back to Table of Contents

SPECIAL PROGRAM INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-53 Music Programs
(# Participants/% of School)

2005

2006

2007
#       %

2007 District Avg.
#               %

 n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a n/a n/a
Indicator should increase
 

Back to Table of Contents

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ADDITIONAL INDICATORS

Figure 7.3-1b Internal Accounts Audit (# of Deficiencies)

2005

2006

2007

2007 District Avg.

 0

1

  n/a

  n/a

Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.5-8a 5-Star Cafeteria Rating (Score)

2006

2007

2008

2008 District Avg.

 98%

96%

90%

99%

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.4-13 Minority Staffing - Teacher (%)

2008

2009

2010

2010 District

6.45
6.67
3.03
11.42
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.5-14 Student/Modern Computer (Ratio)

2005

2006

2007

2007 District

 7:1

7:1

0:1

9:1

Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.4-15 National Board Certified Teachers
(# and % of Teaching staff)

2008

2009

2010

2010 District

# % # % # % # %
5
16.13
5
16.67
5
15.15
617
12.25
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.5-15 IT Proficiency Use of Teachers (%)

2005

2006

2007

2007 District