Sea Park Elementary School

Sea Park Elementary School
300 Sea Park Blvd.
Satellite Beach, FL 32937-2199

Figure 7.1-1j School Grade: Rank in District/State based on Total Points Earned

2007 District/State		2008 District/State		2009 District/State
n/a	n/a	35	434	69	652

Back to Table of Contents

AYP (NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress) INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-8 AYP: % of Total Possible Cells Meeting AYP Standard (% of Criteria Met)

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
97	92	97	79

Figure 7.1-8a AYP : % Scoring At or Above Grade Level in Reading

Subgroup	2007	2007	2009	2009 District/State
Total	81	79	87	73	62
White	80	79	86	77	72
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	51	44
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	64	57
Econ Disadv	67	n/a	77	63	52
Limited Eng	n/a	n/a	n/a	42	42
Students w/ Disabilities	49	47	66	46	36

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-8b AYP : % Scoring At or Above Grade Level in Math

Subgroup	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Total	70	78	82	78	67
White	71	77	82	83	77
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	54	49
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	70	64
Econ Disadv	49	n/a	74	64	57
Limited Eng	n/a	n/a	n/a	51	51
Students w/ Disabilities	41	56	n/a	48	39

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

FCAT Indicators
Figure 7.1-9 FCAT Reading

Figure 7.1-9a FCAT Reading Mean Scale Score

	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Grade 3	335	337	330	325	313
Grade 4	319	325	331	337	324
Grade 5	316	316	325	324	311
Grade 6	329	319	341	334	313

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-9d FCAT Reading Percent at Levels 4 & 5

	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Grade 3	48	56	61	39	47
Grade 4	42	44	49	49	39
Grade 5	38	35	46	46	37
Grade 6	35	39	43	46	32

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-9b FCAT Reading Percent at Level 1

	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Grade 3	8	3	9	12	17
Grade 4	13	14	5	7	13
Grade 5	12	9	11	9	14
Grade 6	9	9	3	8	16

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-9e FCAT Reading Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

	2007 District/State		2008 District/State		2009 District/State
Grade 3	19	253	15	256	23	414
Grade 4	42	749	39	660	38	610
Grade 5	36	614	30	508	24	426
Grade 6	27	121	43	291	21	71

Figure 7.1-9c FCAT Reading Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Grade 3	84	85	85	79	71
Grade 4	83	78	84	84	74
Grade 5	76	72	83	80	70
Grade 6	77	77	97	82	66

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-11 FCAT Mathematics

Figure 7.1-11a FCAT Mathematics Mean Scale Score

	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Grade 3	348	357	352	346	337
Grade 4	326	330	336	340	330
Grade 5	335	344	334	344	335
Grade 6	323	328	353	341	316

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-11d FCAT Math Percent at Levels 4 & 5

	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Grade 3	50	56	57	53	46
Grade 4	29	44	48	46	39
Grade 5	29	35	46	44	36
Grade 6	29	39	43	43	26

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-11b FCAT Mathematics Percent at
Level 1

	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Grade 3	8	0	2	8	10
Grade 4	13	18	8	7	10
Grade 5	12	9	10	10	14
Grade 6	23	9	6	12	24

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-11e FCAT Mathematics Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

	2007 District/State		2007 District/State		2008 District/State
Grade 3	27	387	19	316	27	514
Grade 4	31	621	33	640	32	641
Grade 5	37	682	28	483	40	871
Grade 6	39	221	42	228	16	53

Figure 7.1-11c FCAT Mathematics
Percent Meeting High Standards
(Level 3, 4 and 5)

	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Grade 3	86	91	89	82	78
Grade 4	79	72	84	80	75
Grade 5	60	75	68	70	62
Grade 6	55	66	91	73	55

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-12 FCAT Science

Figure 7.1-12a FCAT Science Mean Scale Score

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 5

336

338

333

334

314

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-12d FCAT Science Percent at Levels 4 & 5

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 5

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-12b FCAT Science Percent at
Level 1

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 5

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-12e FCAT Science Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

	2007 District/State		2008 District/State		2009 District/State
Grade 5	28	183	24	186	30	329

Figure 7.1-12c FCAT Science Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Grade 5	57	69	60	62	46

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-14 FCAT Writing

Figure 7.1-14a FCAT Writing Mean Essay Score

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 4

4.2

3.4

3.9

4.1

4.0

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-14b FCAT Writing Percent
Meeting High Standards
(Essay 3.5 and above)

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 4

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

ACHIEVEMENT GAP INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-16-19 FCAT Learning Gap for Key
Demographics Subgroups (% Improvement
= difference between earliest and most
recent school years)

*baseline 2002 or first year reported

Figure 7.1-16a READING Percent Scoring Level
1 for School

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	15%	10%	9%	8%	-7%
White	16%	11%	10%	8%	-8%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	16%	15%	4%	5%	-11%
ESE	45%	34%	23%	19%	-26%

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-18a SCIENCE Percent Scoring Level 1

Subgroup	2006/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	4%	7%	3%	8%	4%
White	4%	8%	4%	7%	3%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	5%	0%	n/a	n/a	n/a
ESE	23%	25%	n/a	27%	4%

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-16b READING Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	75%	79%	78%	86%	11%
White	74%	79%	80%	86%	12%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	78%	66%	18%	41%	-37%
ESE	45%	38%	30%	33%	-12%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-18b SCIENCE Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup	2006/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	64%	57%	69%	60%	-4%
White	63%	58%	84%	68%	5%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	42%	30%	n/a	n/a	n/a
ESE	46%	42%	n/a	27%	-19%

Indicator should dincrease

Figure 7.1-16c READING Percent Scoring Levels 4 or 5 for School

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	44%	40%	43%	50%	6%
White	46%	45%	45%	52%	6%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	52%	30%	11%	19%	-33%
ESE	36%	13%	7%	11%	-25%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-18c SCIENCE Percent Scoring Levels 4 or 5

Subgroup	2006/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	25%	14%	16%	16%	-9%
White	26%	16%	20%	17%	-9%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	16%	0%	n/a	n/a	n/a
ESE	15%	0%	n/a	0%	-15%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-17a MATH Percent Scoring Level 1 for School

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	10%	15%	10%	7%	-3%
White	9%	15%	9%	7%	-2%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	12%	27%	0%	5%	-7%
ESE	18%	33%	23%	16%	-2%

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-19a WRITING Mean Essay Combined Score

Subgroup	2003/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	3.6	4.2	3.4	3.9	0.3
White	3.6	4.1	3.5	4.0	0.4
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	3.3	n/a	n/a	3.7	0.4
ESE	3.0	n/a	2.7	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increasen/a

Figure 7.1-17b MATH Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	75%	69%	75%	82%	7%
White	76%	69%	76%	82%	6%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	77%	46%	18%	46%	-31%
ESE	63%	42%	27%	30%	-33%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-19b WRITING % Scoring 3.0 or greater on Essay

Subgroup	2003/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	92%	100%	83%	97%	5%
White	91%	100%	82%	97%	6%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	85%	n/a	n/a	100%	15%
ESE	73%	n/a	63%	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-17c MATH Percent Scoring Levels 4
or 5 for School

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	44%	36%	46%	49%	5%
White	47%	36%	48%	50%	3%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	40%	7%	4%	14%	-26%
ESE	45%	21%	4%	11%	-34%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-19c WRITING % Scoring 3.5 or greater on Essay

Subgroup	2003/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	63%	96%	67%	89%	26%
White	69%	95%	67%	90%	21%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	64%	n/a	n/a	80%	16%
ESE	37%	n/a	38%	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

ATTENDANCE INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-28 Total School Student Attendance Rates (%)

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

94.9

94.61

95.26

95.92

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-28a Student Absences by Semester (# and %)

1^st Semester

2^nd Semester

0 abs.

19.94

14.39

1-9 abs.

266

71.69

294

75.57

10-19 abs.

7.27

8.22

20-29 abs.

1.07

1.54

30+ abs.

0.25

Back to Table of Contents

SPECIAL PROGRAM INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-53 Music Programs
(# Participants/% of School)

2005	2006	2007 # %		2007 District Avg. # %
n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ADDITIONAL INDICATORS

Figure 7.3-1b Internal Accounts Audit (# of Deficiencies)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District Avg.
3	1	n/a	n/a

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.5-8a 5-Star Cafeteria Rating (Score)

2006	2007	2008	2008 District Avg.
97%	100%	94%	99%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.4-13 Minority Staffing - Teacher (%)

2008

2009

2010

2010 District

3.13

11.57

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.5-14 Student/Modern Computer (Ratio)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District
5:1	8:1	0:1	9:1

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.4-15 National Board Certified Teachers
(# and % of Teaching staff)

2008

2009

2010

2010 District

18.52

17.24

9.38

558

11.13

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.5-15 IT Proficiency Use of Teachers (%)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District
		84%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.5-6 Custodial Assessment Maintenance
(School Rating)

2006	2007	2008	2008 District
97.38 %	89.89%	93.92%	96.00%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.6-11 5-Star School Status

2005	2006	2007
Yes	Yes	n/a

Indicator is yes or no

Figure 7.6-13 Volunteer Hours
(total # Hrs/Hrs per Student)

2005	2006	2007 hrs /hrs per stdt		2007 District Avg. hrs /hrs per stdt
3,810.83	3,788.58	5,406.57	17.61	12,493.95	16.49

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents