Satellite High School

Table of Contents:

School Demographic Profile
School Grade Indicators
AYP (NCLB Adequate yearly Progress) INDICATORS
FCAT Indicators
Achievement Gap Indicators
High School Indicators
Attendance Indicators
Special Program Indicators
Additional indicators

SCHOOL DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

Total Enrollment

1122

Stability Rate

91.78

Number

Percent

Free/Reduced Lunch

214

18.69

Minority Enrollment

148

13.19

Exceptional Ed (not gifted)

110

9.8

Gifted Education

151

13.45

English Language Learners

0.53

SCHOOL GRADE INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-1 School Grade History

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
A	A	B	A

Figure 7.1-1e School Grade : % Making Reading Gains

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
66	69	59	66

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1a School Grade: % Meeting
High Standards in Reading

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
71	74	68	78

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1f School Grade : % Making Math Gains

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
78	80	78	74

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1b School Grade: % Meeting
High Standards in Math

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
91	92	93	84

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1g School Grade : % of Lowest 25%
Making Learning Gains in Reading

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
54	58	48	62

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1c School Grade: % Meeting
High Standards in Writing

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
89	89	88	90

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1h School Grade: % of Lowest 25%
Making Learning Gains in Math

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
76	79	74	65

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1d School Grade: % Meeting
High Standards in Science

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
73	76	67	64

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1i School Grade: Total Points Earned

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
598	617	575	583

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1j School Grade: Rank in District/State based on Total Points Earned

2007 District/State		2008 District/State		2009 District/State
n/a	n/a	5	22	5	1042

Back to Table of Contents

AYP (NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress) INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-8 AYP: % of Total Possible Cells Meeting AYP Standard (% of Criteria Met)

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
100	100	97	79

Figure 7.1-8a AYP : % Scoring At or Above Grade Level in Reading

Subgroup	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Total	66	69	65	73	62
White	68	71	64	77	72
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	51	44
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	64	57
Econ Disadv	n/a	n/a	n/a	63	52
Limited Eng	n/a	n/a	n/a	42	42
Students w/ Disabilities	n/a	n/a	n/a	46	36

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-8b AYP : % Scoring At or Above Grade Level in Math

Subgroup	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Total	88	88	90	78	67
White	88	89	91	83	77
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	54	49
Hispanic	90	n/a	n/a	70	64
Econ Disadv	76	n/a	n/a	64	57
Limited Eng	n/a	n/a	n/a	51	51
Students w/ Disabilities	62	n/a	n/a	48	39

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

FCAT INDICATORS
Figure 7.1-9 FCAT Reading

Figure 7.1-9a FCAT Reading Mean Scale Score

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 9

339

341

329

316

Grade10

345

342

339

325

305

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-9c FCAT Reading Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 9

Grade10

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-9b FCAT Reading Percent at Level 1

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 9

Grade10

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-9d FCAT Reading Percent at Levels 4 & 5

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 9

Grade10

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-9e FCAT Reading Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

	2007 District/State		2008 District/State		2009 District/State
Grade 9	4	23	5	34	4	34
Grade10	4	29	4	28	4	32

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-11 FCAT Mathematics

Figure 7.1-11a FCAT Mathematics Mean Scale Score

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 9

334

338

339

326

313

Grade10

351

347

346

340

327

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-11c FCAT Mathematics Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 9

Grade10

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-11b FCAT Mathematics Percent at
Level 1

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 9

Grade10

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-11d FCAT Math Percent at Levels 4 & 5

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 9

Grade10

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-11e FCAT Math Percent Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

	2007 District/State		2008 District/State		2009 District/State
Grade 9	4	32	4	28	4	34
Grade10	4	32	4	29	5	44

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-12 FCAT Science

Figure 7.1-12a FCAT Science Mean Scale Score

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 11

343

350

334

326

303

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-12c FCAT Science Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 11

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-12b FCAT Science Percent at
Level 1

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 11

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-12d FCAT Science Percent at Levels 4 & 5

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 11

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-12e FCAT Science Mean Scale Score: Rank in
District/Rank in State

	2007 District/State		2008 District/State		2009 District/State
Grade11	4	20	3	17	5	36

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-14 FCAT Writing

Figure 7.1-14a FCAT Writing Mean Essay Score

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade10

4.4

4.1

3.9

4.0

3.8

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-14b FCAT Writing Percent Meeting High Standards (Essay 3.5 and above)

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade10

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

ACHIEVEMENT GAP INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-16-19 FCAT Learning Gap for Key
Demographics Subgroups (% Improvement
= difference between earliest and most
recent school years)

*baseline 2002 or first year reported

Figure 7.1-16a READING Percent Scoring Level
1 for School

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	13%	10%	9%	7%	-6%
White	13%	9%	7%	7%	-6%
Black	20%	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	16%	0%	6%	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	27%	19%	7%	7%	-20%
ESE	48%	35%	40%	40%	-8%

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-18a SCIENCE Percent Scoring Level 1

Subgroup	2006/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	8%	7%	6%	8%	0%
White	8%	7%	5%	6%	-2%
Black	9%	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	7%	10%	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	5%	10%	4%	22%	17%
ESE	42%	15%	32%	27%	-15%

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-16b READING Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	57%	66%	68%	65%	8%
White	58%	68%	70%	66%	8%
Black	48%	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	58%	54%	22%	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	46%	46%	62%	49%	3%
ESE	14%	33%	28%	25%	11%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-18b SCIENCE Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup	2006/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	66%	71%	73%	62%	-4%
White	64%	71%	75%	64%	0%
Black	64%	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	67%	71%	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	64%	58%	60%	48%	-16%
ESE	26%	54%	32%	33%	7%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-16c READING Percent Scoring Levels 4 or 5 for School

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	28%	37%	37%	32%	4%
White	28%	39%	39%	33%	5%
Black	20%	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	13%	18%	0%	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	11%	12%	23%	17%	6%
ESE	4%	12%	16%	8%	4%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-18c SCIENCE Percent Scoring Levels 4 or 5

Subgroup	2006/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	14%	16%	24%	12%	-2%
White	13%	17%	25%	13%	0%
Black	18%	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	33%	14%	n/a	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	18%	6%	16%	0%	-18%
ESE	3%	8%	5%	15%	12%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-17a MATH Percent Scoring Level 1 for School

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	6%	2%	3%	3%	-3%
White	5%	2%	3%	3%	-2%
Black	8%	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	10%	0%	0%	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	0%	4%	5%	5%	5%
ESE	33%	14%	22%	39%	6%

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-19a WRITING Mean Essay Combined Score

Subgroup	2003/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	4.2	4.4	4.1	3.9	-0.3
White	4.2	4.4	4.1	3.9	-0.3
Black	4.4	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	3.8	n/a	3.9	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	4.1	3.8	3.9	3.8	-0.3
ESE	3.4	3.8	3.5	3.3	-0.1

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-17b MATH Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	80%	86%	88%	91%	11%
White	81%	87%	89%	92%	11%
Black	68%	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	68%	91%	56%	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	82%	74%	89%	85%	3%
ESE	33%	50%	54%	51%	18%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-19b WRITING % Scoring 3.0 or greater on Essay

Subgroup	2003/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	97%	97%	95%	95%	-2%
White	97%	96%	95%	95%	-2%
Black	100%	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	93%	n/a	91%	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	95%	94%	91%	92%	-3%
ESE	78%	83%	81%	68%	-10%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-17c MATH Percent Scoring Levels 4
or 5 for School

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	56%	61%	64%	61%	5%
White	57%	64%	65%	62%	5%
Black	48%	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	45%	27%	45%	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	42%	41%	54%	44%	2%
ESE	12%	29%	30%	32%	20%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-19c WRITING % Scoring 3.5 or greater on Essay

Subgroup	2003/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	91%	88%	85%	83%	-8%
White	92%	87%	86%	85%	-7%
Black	86%	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Hispanic	85%	n/a	82%	n/a	n/a
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	89%	72%	85%	86%	-3%
ESE	66%	74%	57%	46%	-20%

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

HIGH SCHOOL INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-10 GRADUATION RATE (%)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District/State
96.47	96.41	n/a	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

SAT

Figure 7.1-20 SAT Scores - Verbal/Critical Reading

2005	2006	2007	District	State	Nation
536	526	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-22a SAT Scores - Writing

2005	2006	2007	District	State	Nation
n/a	507	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-21 SAT Scores - Math

2005	2006	2007	District	State	Nation
550	544	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-22 SAT Scores - Composite and # Tested

2005	2006*	2007*	District	State	Nation
1086	1577	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Number Tested
356	388	n/a	n/a

Composite Score should increase *Critical Reading + Math + Writing

Back to Table of Contents

ACT

Figure 7.1-23 ACT Scores - English

2005	2006	2007	District	State	Nation
22.5	21.8	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-24 ACT Scores - Math

2005	2006	2007	District	State	Nation
24	22.9	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-26 ACT Scores - Science

2005	2006	2007	District	State	Nation
23	22.3	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-25 ACT Scores - Reading

2005	2006	2007	District	State	Nation
23.2	22.9	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-27 ACT Scores - Composite and # Tested

2005	2006*	2007*	District	State	Nation
23.3	22.6	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
Number Tested
166	200	n/a	n/a

Composite Score should increase

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-34 BRIGHT FUTURES SCHOLARS-
# and % Qualified of Eligible Graduating Seniors

2005		2006		2007		2007 District
#	%	#	%	#	%	#	%
242	n/a	269	n/a

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-35 NATIONAL MERIT-
# of Merit Scholar Finalists

2005	2006	2007	2007 District Avg.
4	5	3	1.7

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

DUAL ENROLLMENT

Figure 7.1-39 Dual Enrollment - # and % of
Students Participating* of all Students in gr.
10-12

2005		2006		2007		2007 District
#	%	#	%	#	%	#	%
n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	145	12	136.7	13

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-40 Dual Enrollment - # of Course Enrollments

2005	2006	2007	2007 Percent of All District Enrollments
835	671	620	8

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-41 Dual Enrollment - # of Students Receiving AA and HS
Diploma at Graduation

2005	2006	2007	2007 District Avg.
6	2	4	2.8

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

ADVANCED PLACEMENT

Figure 7.1-44 Advanced Placement - # and %
of Students Scoring 3.0 or Greater on All Tests

2005		2006		2007		2007 District
#	%	#	%	#	%	#	%
381	59	401	57	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-45 Advanced Placement - # Exams Taken

2005	2006	2007	2007 District Avg.
643	702	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-44a Advanced Placement
- Number Tested and % at 3 and Above for Most Recent Year by Subject Tested

Test Name	# tested	# scoring 3 & above	% scoring 3 & above
			School	District	State	Global

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-46 Advanced Placement -
# and % of Students Participating* of All Students in gr. 9-12

	2005		2006		2007		2007 District
Gr.	#	%	#	%	#	%	#	%
9	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
10	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
11	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
12	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
9-12	336	17	392	20

Indicator should increase *unduplicated

Back to Table of Contents

COLLEGE PLACEMENT TESTS

Figure 7.2-11 College Placement Test Results - Students College-Ready in Reading (% Students)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District
86.9	86.9	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.2-13 College Placement Tests
Results - Students College-Ready in Math (% Students)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District
81.8	84.6	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.2-12 College Placement Test Results -
Students College-Ready in Writing (% Students)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District
93.1	93.4	n/a	n/a

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

ATTENDANCE INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-28 Total School Student Attendance Rates (%)

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

96.01

96.49

96.44

95.92

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-28a Student Absences by Semester (# and %)

1^st Semester

2^nd Semester

0 abs.

383

31.89

311

26.4

1-9 abs.

750

62.44

781

66.29

10-19 abs.

4.49

5.94

20-29 abs.

0.91

1.1

30+ abs.

0.24

0.25

Back to Table of Contents

SPECIAL PROGRAM INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-29 Science Research (#Participants/% of School)

2005	2006	2007 # %		2007 District Avg. # %
58	66	54	3.4	20.5	1.3

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-53 Music Programs (# of Participants/% of School)

2005	2006	2007 # %		2007 District Avg. # %
456	544	459	29.1	381.2	24.4

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ADDITIONAL INDICATORS

Figure 7.3-1b Internal Accounts Audit (# of Deficiencies)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District Avg.
2	1	n/a	n/a

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.5-8a 5-Star Cafeteria Rating (Score)

2006	2007	2008	2008 District Avg.
93%	95%	96%	99%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.4-13 Minority Staffing - Teacher (%)

2008

2009

2010

2010 District

3.8

3.9

2.7

11.57

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.5-14 Student/Modern Computer (Ratio)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District Avg.
8:1	8:1	6:1	9:1

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.4-15 National Board Certified Teachers
(# and % of Teaching staff)

2008

2009

2010

2010 District

15.19

14.29

14.86

558

11.13

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.5-15 IT Proficiency Use of Teachers (%)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District Avg.
		89%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.5-6 Custodial Assessment Maintenance
(School Rating)

2006	2007	2008	2008 District Avg.
98.18%	88.74%	91.88%	96.00%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.6-11 5-Star School Status

2005	2006	2007
yes	yes	n/a

Indicator is yes or no

Figure 7.6-13 Volunteer Hours
(total # Hrs/Hrs per Student)

2005	2006	2007 hrs /hrs per stdt		2007 District Avg. hrs /hrs per stdt
22,243.07	19,560.25	23,110.50	20.23	12,493.95	16.49

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents