Brevard Public Schools
Updated: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 Search This Site


District Directory
Customer Service BPS-TV Pre-Paid Lunch
School Menu
BPS Emergencies
- BPS Emergency site

- Are you ready for a
  hurricane? 7 Year Facility Plan Update
Vendor Information
- District Bid Activity

- Purchasing Services


SSNP


 

BPS SCORECARD
School Results Profile

Printer
 Friendly Page


Main 

Quest Elementary School
8751 Trafford Drive
Melbourne, Florida 32940

Phone: (321) 242-1411
Fax: (321) 242-1719

Elia Lea, Principal

 

School Website: Click Here.
School Improvement Plan: Click Here.

Table of Contents:

SCHOOL DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

Total Enrollment
841
 Stability Rate
93.25

 

Number

Percent
Free/Reduced Lunch

119

14.05
Minority Enrollment
195
23.18
Exceptional Ed (not gifted)
133
15.81
Gifted Education
79
9.39
English Language Learners
15
1.78

School Grade Indicators

Figure 7.1-1 School Grade History

2007

2008

2009

2009 District
A A A A
Figure 7.1-1e School Grade: % Making Reading Gains

2007

2008

2009

2009 District
82 74 82 66
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1a School Grade: % Meeting
 High Standards in Reading

2007

2008

2009

2009 District
96 96 96 78
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1f School Grade: % Making Math Gains

2007

2008

2009

2009 District
81 76 80 74
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1b School Grade: % Meeting
 High Standards in Math

2007

2008

2009

2009 District
95 91 83 84
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1g School Grade: % of Lowest 25%
Making Learning Gains in Reading

2007

2008

2009

2009 District
86 80 86 62
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1c School Grade: % Meeting
 High Standards in Writing

2007

2008

2009

2009 District
99 97 95 90
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1h School Grade: % of Lowest 25%
Making Learning Gains in Math

2007

2008

2009

2009 District
82 73 77 65
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1d School Grade: % Meeting
 High Standards in Science

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

89

81

 83 64
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-1i School Grade: Total Points Earned

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

710

668

 692 583
Indicator should increase

2007
District/State

2008
District/State

2009
District/State

 n/a

 n/a

 8

 36

 6 41

 

Back to Table of Contents
 

  

AYP (NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress) INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-8 AYP: % of Total Possible Cells Meeting AYP Standard (% of Criteria Met)

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

 100

100

 100 79
 
Figure 7.1-8a AYP: % Scoring At or Above Grade Level in Reading

Subgroup

2007

2008

2009

2009 District/State

Total

 94 92 93 73 62

White

 94 93 94 77 72

Black

 n/a n/a n/a 51 44

Hispanic

 n/a n/a n/a 64 57

Econ Disadv

n/a

 n/a n/a 63 52

Limited Eng

n/a

 n/a n/a 42 42

Students w/ Disabilities

 n/a n/a n/a 46 36
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-8b AYP: % Scoring At or Above Grade Level in Math

Subgroup

2007

2008

2009

2009 District/State

Total

 93 88 90 78 67

White

 93 88 91 83 77

Black

n/a

 n/a n/a 54 49

Hispanic

n/a

 n/a n/a 70 64

Econ Disadv

n/a

 n/a n/a 64 57

Limited Eng

n/a

 n/a n/a 51 51

Students w/ Disabilities

 n/a n/a n/a 48 39
Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents  

FCAT Indicators
Figure 7.1-9       FCAT Reading

Figure 7.1-9a FCAT Reading Mean Scale Score

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 342 342  344 325 313

Grade 4

360

 356  353 337 324
Grade 5 343 343  348 324 311
Grade 6 361 361  348 334 313

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-9d FCAT Reading Percent at Levels 4 & 5

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

68

 57 55 47 39

Grade 4

72

64

 61 49 39
Grade 5 68 59 68 46 37
Grade 6 66 67 61 46 32
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-9b FCAT Reading Percent at Level 1

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

2

5

 6 12 17

Grade 4

4

3

 3 7 13
Grade 5 2 3 1 9 14
Grade 6 1 1 5 8 16
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.1-9e FCAT Reading Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

 

2007
District/State

2008
District/State

2009
District/State

Grade 3

 7

 37

12

161

 12 163

Grade 4

 7

 24

7

38

 9 83
Grade 5 6 22 8 54 7 62
Grade 6 5 6 5 8 13 43
Figure 7.1-9c FCAT Reading Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

 

2007

2008

2009

      2009
District/State

Grade 3

92

 90 92 79 71

Grade 4

90

91

 92 84 74
Grade 5 95 88 92 80 71
Grade 6 96 96 92 82 66
Indicator should increase		  

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-11       FCAT Mathematics

Figure 7.1-11a FCAT Mathematics Mean Scale Score

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 376 361 362 346 337

Grade 4

 353 360 363 340 330
Grade 5 366 365 362 344 335
Grade 6 365 360 365 341 316

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-11d FCAT Math Percent at Levels 4 & 5

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 50 57 62 53 46

Grade 4

 60 64 69 46 39
Grade 5 67 59 55 44 36
Grade 6 56 67 68 43 26
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-11b FCAT Mathematics Percent at
 Level 1

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 3

 0 3 3 8 10

Grade 4

 4 2 4 7 10
Grade 5 2 3 2 10 14
Grade 6 4 4 4 12 24
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.1-11e FCAT Mathematics Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

 

2007
District/State

2008
District/State

2009
District/State

Grade 3

 9 53 14 237  17 301

Grade 4

 9 108 12 106  9 103
Grade 5 8 53 10 86 10 130
Grade 6 6 10 10 19 8 17
 
Figure 7.1-11c FCAT Mathematics
Percent Meeting High Standards
(Level 3, 4 and 5)

 

2007

2008

2009

2009
District/State

Grade 3

 86 90 92 82 78

Grade 4

 91 89 92 80 75
Grade 5 86 83 83 70 62
Grade 6 94 84 86 73 55
Indicator should increase		  

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-12       FCAT Science

Figure 7.1-12a FCAT Science Mean Scale Score

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 5

 361 357 357 334 314

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-12d FCAT Science Percent at Levels 4 & 5

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 5

 35 35 36 20 12
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-12b FCAT Science Percent at
 Level 1

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 5

 3 5 2 11 21
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.1-12e FCAT Science Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

 

2007
District/State

2008
District/State

2009
District/State
Grade 5 11 20 9 35 9 44
Figure 7.1-12c FCAT Science Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

 

2007

2008

2009

2009
District/State
Grade 5 87 75 77 62 46
Indicator should increase		  

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-14       FCAT Writing

Figure 7.1-14a FCAT Writing Mean Essay Score

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 4

 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.1 4.0

Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-14b FCAT Writing Percent
Meeting High Standards
(Essay 3.5 and above)

 

2007

2008

2009

2009

District/State

Grade 4

 96 96 92 86 85

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

ACHIEVEMENT GAP INDICATORS

     
Figure 7.1-16-19 FCAT Learning Gap for Key
Demographics Subgroups (% Improvement
= difference between earliest and most
recent school years)

*baseline 2002 or first year reported

Figure 7.1-16a READING Percent Scoring Level
1 for School

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 5%   2% 3% 4% -1%
White 3%   2% 2% 2% -1%
Black 7%   n/a 7% n/a n/a
Hispanic 0%   n/a 0% 5% 5%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 0%   5% 3% 10% 10%
ESE 19%   7% 18% 16% -3%
Indicator should decrease		  



 
Figure 7.1-18a SCIENCE Percent Scoring Level 1

Subgroup 2006/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 4%   3% 5% 2% -2%
White 6%   2% 5% 1% -5%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic 0%   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 0%   10% n/a 11% 11%
ESE 10%   10% 18% 11% 1%
Indicator should decrease
     
Figure 7.1-16b READING Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 90%   93% 91% 92% 2%
White 91%   94% 92% 93% 2%
Black 25%   n/a 25% n/a n/a
Hispanic 100%   n/a 25% 54% -46%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 90%   92% 51% 80% -10%
ESE 75%   84% 71% 70% -5%
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-18b SCIENCE Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup 2006/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 73%   87% 75% 77% 4%
White 71%   89% 76% 81% 10%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic 90%   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 40%   70% n/a 44% 4%
ESE 70%   70% 27% 53% -17%
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-16c READING Percent Scoring Levels 4 or 5 for School

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 64%   69% 62% 62% -2%
White 66%   68% 62% 63% -3%
Black 18%   n/a 18% n/a n/a
Hispanic 90%   n/a 22% 41% -49%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 60%   58% 38% 36% -24%
ESE 31%   44% 44% 36% 5%
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-18c SCIENCE Percent Scoring Levels 4 or 5

Subgroup 2006/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 29%   35% 35% 36% 7%
White 31%   36% 36% 37% 6%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic 40%   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 10%   0% n/a 11% 1%
ESE 10%   10% 0% 16% 6%
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-17a MATH Percent Scoring Level 1 for School

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 7%   2% 3% 3% -4%
White 5%   2% 3% 2% -3%
Black 4%   n/a 4% n/a n/a
Hispanic 10%   n/a 0% 5% -5%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 0%   3% 3% 10% 10%
ESE 13%   7% 13% 15% 2%
Indicator should decrease		  
Figure 7.1-19a WRITING Mean Essay Combined Score

Subgroup 2003/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 4.5   4.4 4.5 4.5 0.0
White 4.5   4.4 4.5 4.5 0.0
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic 5.1   n/a n/a 5.1 0.0
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 4.4   n/a 4.4 4.6 0.2
ESE 4.2   4.0 4.1 4.0 -0.2
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-17b MATH Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 84%   91% 87% 88% 4%
White 84%   91% 88% 90% 6%
Black 22%   n/a 22% n/a n/a
Hispanic 90%   n/a 28% 52% -38%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 80%   89% 43% 74% -6%
ESE 69%   78% 69% 67% -2%
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-19b WRITING % Scoring 3.0 or greater on Essay

Subgroup 2003/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 98%   99% 99% 97% -1%
White 98%   99% 99% 98% 0%
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic 100%   n/a n/a 100% 0%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 100%   n/a 100% 99% -1%
ESE 90%   100% 94% 76% -14%
Indicator should increase
   
Figure 7.1-17c MATH Percent Scoring Levels 4
or 5 for School

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 51%   64% 60% 63% 12%
White 52%   65% 61% 65% 13%
Black 15%   n/a 15% n/a n/a
Hispanic 80%   n/a 22% 43% -37%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 10%   42% 16% 38% 28%
ESE 19%   42% 35% 40% 21%
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-19c WRITING % Scoring 3.5 or greater on Essay

Subgroup 2003/
Baseline		   2007 2008 2009 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 96%   96% 96% 92% -4%   
White 95%   97% 95% 94% 1%   
Black n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
Hispanic 92%   n/a n/a 92% 0%
ELL n/a   n/a n/a n/a n/a
ED 100%   n/a 100% 100% 0%
ESE 89%   90% 88% 69% -20%   
Indicator should increase


Back to Table of Contents

ATTENDANCE INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-28 Total School Student Attendance Rates (%)

2007

2008

2009

2009 District
95.99
95.61
96.23
96.49
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-28a Student Absences by Semester (# and %)

 

1st  Semester

2nd Semester

 

#

%

#

%

0 abs.
112
12.66
196
22.92

1-9 abs.
706
79.86
642
75.08

10-19 abs.
58
6.56
15
1.75

20-29 abs.
8
0.9
2
0.23

30+ abs.
0
0
0
0
 

Back to Table of Contents

SPECIAL PROGRAM INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-53 Music Programs
(# Participants/% of School)

2005

2006

2007
#       %

2007 District Avg.
#               %

 n/a

 n/a

 n/a

 n/a

 n/a

 n/a
Indicator should increase		  

Back to Table of Contents

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ADDITIONAL INDICATORS

Figure 7.3-1b Internal Accounts Audit (# of Deficiencies)

2005

2006

2007

2007 District Avg.
2 3 n/a n/a
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.5-8a 5-Star Cafeteria Rating (Score)

2006

2007

2008

2008 District Avg.

 94%

92%

97% 

 99%
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.4-13 Minority Staffing - Teacher (%)

2008

2009

2010

2010 District
6.45
8.62
6.78
11.42
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.5-14 Student/Modern Computer (Ratio)

2005

2006

2007

2007 District

 3:1

3:1 

3:1 

9:1 
Indicator should decrease
Figure 7.4-15 National Board Certified Teachers
(# and % of Teaching staff)

2008

2009

2010

2010 District
# % # % # % # %
12
19.35
13
22.41
14
23.73
617
12.25
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.5-15 IT Proficiency Use of Teachers (%)

2005

2006

2007

2007 District

 

 

 90%

 
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.5-6 Custodial Assessment Maintenance
 (School Rating)

2006

2007

2008

2008 District

 96.54%

88.86%