Delaura Middle School

Table of Contents:

School Demographic Profile
School Grade Indicators
AYP (NCLB Adequate yearly Progress) INDICATORS
FCAT Indicators
Achievement Gap Indicators
Attendance Indicators
Special Program Indicators
Additional indicators

SCHOOL DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

Total Enrollment

665

Stability Rate

93.69

Number

Percent

Free/Reduced Lunch

11.65

Minority Enrollment

105

15.78

Exceptional Ed (not gifted)

12.03

Gifted Education

12.78

English Language Learners

0.9

SCHOOL GRADE INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-1 School Grade History

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
A	A	A	A

Figure 7.1-1e School Grade : % Making Reading Gains

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
63	70	66	66

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1a School Grade: % Meeting
High Standards in Reading

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
85	88	90	78

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1f School Grade : % Making Math Gains

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
82	82	83	74

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1b School Grade: % Meeting
High Standards in Math

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
92	91	95	84

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1g School Grade : % of Lowest 25%
Making Learning Gains in Reading

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
67	71	69	62

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1c School Grade: % Meeting
High Standards in Writing

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
97	100	98	90

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1h School Grade: % of Lowest 25%
Making Learning Gains in Math

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
81	85	87	65

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1d School Grade: % Meeting
High Standards in Science

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
76	74	78	64

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1i School Grade: Total Points Earned

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
643	661	666	583

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-1j School Grade: Rank in District/State based on Total Points Earned

2007 District/State		2008 District/State		2009 District/State
n/a	n/a	2	8	1	117

Back to Table of Contents

AYP (NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress) INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-8 AYP: % of Total Possible Cells Meeting AYP Standard (% of Criteria Met)

2007	2008	2009	2009 District
100	97	100	79

Figure 7.1-8a AYP : % Scoring At or Above Grade Level in Reading

Subgroup	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Total	82	85	86	73	62
White	81	84	86	77	72
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	51	44
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	64	57
Econ Disadv	n/a	n/a	n/a	63	52
Limited Eng	n/a	n/a	n/a	42	42
Students w/ Disabilities	n/a	n/a	n/a	46	36

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-8b AYP : % Scoring At or Above Grade Level in Math

Subgroup	2007	2008	2009	2009 District/State
Total	87	88	92	78	67
White	88	89	93	83	77
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	54	49
Hispanic	n/a	n/a	n/a	70	64
Econ Disadv	n/a	n/a	n/a	64	57
Limited Eng	n/a	n/a	n/a	51	51
Students w/ Disabilities	n/a	n/a	n/a	48	39

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

FCAT INDICATORS
Figure 7.1-9 FCAT Reading

Figure 7.1-9a FCAT Reading Mean Scale Score

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 7

346

345

351

333

318

Grade 8

335

341

344

326

312

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-9c FCAT Reading Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 7

Grade 8

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-9b FCAT Reading Percent at Level 1

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 7

Grade 8

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-9d FCAT Reading Percent at Levels 4 & 5

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 7

Grade 8

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-9e FCAT Reading Percent Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

	2007 District/State		2008 District/State		2009 District/State
Grade 7	4	33	4	48	3	33
Grade 8	3	34	4	24	4	29

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-11 FCAT Mathematics

Figure 7.1-11a FCAT Mathematics Mean Scale Score

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 7

348

341

351

328

314

Grade 8

350

349

347

334

322

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-11c FCAT Mathematics Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 7

Grade 8

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-11b FCAT Mathematics Percent at
Level 1

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 7

Grade 8

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-11d FCAT Math Percent at Levels 4 & 5

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 7

Grade 8

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-11e FCAT Math Percent Mean Scale Score: Rank in District/Rank in State

	2007 District/State		2008 District/State		2009 District/State
Grade 7	3	28	5	65	4	20
Grade 8	4	30	4	48	4	46

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-12 FCAT Science

Figure 7.1-12a FCAT Science Mean Scale Score

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 8

348

350

352

331

305

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-12c FCAT Science Percent Meeting High Standards (Level 3, 4 and 5)

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 8

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-12b FCAT Science Percent at
Level 1

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 8

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-12d FCAT Science Percent at Levels 4 & 5

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 8

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-12e FCAT Science Percent Mean Scale Score: Rank in
District/Rank in State

	2007 District/State		2008 District/State		2009 District/State
Grade 8	4	26	4	30	4	30

Back to Table of Contents

Figure 7.1-14 FCAT Writing

Figure 7.1-14a FCAT Writing Mean Essay Score

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 8

4.4

4.8

4.5

4.3

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-14b FCAT Writing Percent Meeting High Standards (Essay 3.5 and above)

2007

2008

2009

District/State

Grade 8

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

ACHIEVEMENT GAP INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-16-19 FCAT Learning Gap for Key
Demographics Subgroups (% Improvement
= difference between earliest and most
recent school years)

*baseline 2002 or first year reported

Figure 7.1-16a READING Percent Scoring Level
1 for School

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	8%	3%	2%	2%	-6%
White	9%	3%	3%	2%	-7%
Black	25%	n/a	0%	0%	-25%
Hispanic	0%	5%	3%	2%	2%
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	17%	3%	3%	6%	-11%
ESE	37%	24%	15%	5%	-32%

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-18a SCIENCE Percent Scoring Level 1

Subgroup	2006/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	5%	4%	5%	4%	-1%
White	5%	4%	5%	3%	-2%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	0%	0%
Hispanic	6%	0%	8%	10%	4%
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	13%	5%	0%	10%	-3%
ESE	17%	17%	21%	22%	5%

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-16b READING Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	76%	82%	84%	86%	10%
White	75%	82%	85%	87%	12%
Black	58%	n/a	59%	47%	-11%
Hispanic	66%	90%	89%	84%	18%
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	59%	72%	76%	77%	18%
ESE	34%	45%	58%	63%	29%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-18b SCIENCE Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup	2006/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	67%	71%	69%	75%	8%
White	69%	71%	69%	75%	6%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	79%	0%
Hispanic	50%	80%	67%	67%	17%
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	46%	55%	52%	73%	27%
ESE	48%	37%	28%	53%	5%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-16c READING Percent Scoring Levels 4 or 5 for School

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	42%	40%	45%	47%	5%
White	41%	39%	45%	47%	6%
Black	25%	n/a	35%	24%	-1%
Hispanic	31%	38%	45%	49%	18%
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	24%	22%	29%	34%	10%
ESE	8%	7%	14%	17%	9%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-18c SCIENCE Percent Scoring Levels 4 or 5

Subgroup	2006/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	16%	19%	20%	22%	6%
White	16%	18%	21%	24%	8%
Black	n/a	n/a	n/a	7%	0%
Hispanic	6%	20%	25%	19%	13%
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	2%	9%	10%	15%	13%
ESE	2%	3%	7%	12%	10%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-17a MATH Percent Scoring Level 1 for School

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	10%	3%	4%	2%	-8%
White	9%	3%	3%	2%	-7%
Black	17%	n/a	0%	0%	-17%
Hispanic	25%	5%	7%	7%	-18%
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	18%	7%	9%	2%	-16%
ESE	36%	24%	22%	12%	-24%

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.1-19a WRITING Mean Essay Combined Score

Subgroup	2003/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	4.3	4.4	4.8	4.5	0.2
White	4.3	4.4	4.9	4.5	0.2
Black	4.5	n/a	n/a	4.4	-0.1
Hispanic	4.2	4.7	4.5	4.3	0.1
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	3.8	4.2	4.5	4.5	0.7
ESE	3.4	3.6	4.3	3.9	0.5

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-17b MATH Percent Meeting High
Standards (Scoring Levels 3, 4 or 5) for school

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	79%	87%	88%	92%	13%
White	78%	88%	89%	93%	15%
Black	67%	n/a	53%	62%	-5%
Hispanic	69%	90%	87%	84%	15%
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	70%	75%	77%	86%	16%
ESE	40%	44%	58%	71%	31%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-19b WRITING % Scoring 3.0 or greater on Essay

Subgroup	2003/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	97%	99%	99%	98%	1%
White	96%	98%	100%	98%	2%
Black	100%	n/a	n/a	99%	-1%
Hispanic	100%	100%	100%	97%	-3%
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	85%	100%	100%	100%	156%
ESE	75%	89%	96%	97%	22%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-17c MATH Percent Scoring Levels 4
or 5 for School

Subgroup	2002/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	44%	56%	51%	53%	9%
White	44%	58%	52%	54%	10%
Black	25%	n/a	18%	24%	-1%
Hispanic	45%	57%	52%	42%	-3%
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	28%	33%	31%	31%	3%
ESE	8%	14%	13%	20%	12%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-19c WRITING % Scoring 3.5 or greater on Essay

Subgroup	2003/ Baseline	2007	2008	2009	%Improved baseline to current year
All Students	90%	94%	97%	97%	7%
White	89%	93%	98%	97%	8%
Black	99%	n/a	n/a	93%	-6%
Hispanic	94%	90%	92%	90%	-4%
ELL	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a
ED	72%	90%	96%	95%	23%
ESE	58%	65%	79%	86%	28%

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

ATTENDANCE INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-28 Total School Student Attendance Rates (%)

2007

2008

2009

2009 District

95.68

96.33

97.3

96.66

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-28a Student Absences by Semester (# and %)

1^st Semester

2^nd Semester

0 abs.

167

23.68

276

40.7

1-9 abs.

504

71.48

397

58.55

10-19 abs.

4.53

0.73

20-29 abs.

0.28

30+ abs.

Back to Table of Contents

SPECIAL PROGRAM INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-29 Science Research (#Participants/% of School)

2005	2006	2007 # %		2007 District Avg. # %
43	39	54	12.9	20.5	1.3

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.1-53 Music Programs (# of Participants/% of School)

2005	2006	2007 # %		2007 District Avg. # %
291	385	356	51.7	292.9	39.8

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ADDITIONAL INDICATORS

Figure 7.3-1b Internal Accounts Audit (# of Deficiencies)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District Avg.
2	0	n/a	n/a

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.5-8a 5-Star Cafeteria Rating (Score)

2006	2007	2008	2008 District Avg.
91%	91%	95%	99%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.4-13 Minority Staffing - Teacher (%)

2008

2009

2010

2010 District

2.44

2.22

2.08

11.42

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.5-14 Student/Modern Computer (Ratio)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District
4:1	14:1	17:1	9:1

Indicator should decrease

Figure 7.4-15 National Board Certified Teachers
(# and % of Teaching staff)

2008

2009

2010

2010 District

19.51

17.78

14.58

617

12.25

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.5-15 IT Proficiency Use of Teachers (%)

2005	2006	2007	2007 District
		94%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.5-6 Custodial Assessment Maintenance
(School Rating)

2006	2007	2008	2008 District
98.09%	93.27%	91.41%	96.00%

Indicator should increase

Figure 7.6-11 5-Star School Status

2005	2006	2007
Yes	Yes	n/a

Indicator is yes or no

Figure 7.6-13 Volunteer Hours
(total # Hrs/Hrs per Student)

2005	2006	2007 hrs /hrs per stdt		2007 District Avg. hrs /hrs per stdt
5,965.65	4,811.10	3,612.23	5.24	12,493.95	16.49

Indicator should increase

Back to Table of Contents